@article{TGH5549,
author = {Fabio Carboni and Mario Valle and Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri and Manuel Giofrè and Orietta Federici and Settimio Zazza and Alfredo Garofalo},
title = {Transanal drainage tube: alternative option to defunctioning stoma in rectal cancer surgery?},
journal = {Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology},
volume = {5},
number = {0},
year = {2019},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains the most dreaded complication after rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of transanal drainage tube in reducing the incidence, severity and hospital costs respect to defunctioning stoma (DS).
Methods: Considering 429 patients consecutively operated for rectal adenocarcinoma, the tube was placed in 275 (Group A) and not placed in 154 (Group B) patients. A DS was created in a subgroup of 54 patients among the latter.
Results: The incidence of AL was significantly higher in Group B (P=0.007). In patients with DS, the incidence was higher than Group A (P=NS). Grade C complications were significantly higher in Group B (P=0.006) and Grade B complications were significantly higher in patients with DS (P=0.03). Estimated economic benefit was 4,000 Euros for each patient.
Conclusions: Transanal drainage tube may be a safe and effective alternative to DS in many cases. The incidence of leakage and Grade C complications are reduced albeit not significantly but Grade B complications are significantly lower. Although the AL incidence was similar in our experience, the tube allows to avoid a stoma-related consequence and the need for reversal procedure with economic benefit.},
issn = {2415-1289}, url = {https://tgh.amegroups.org/article/view/5549}
}